Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:36 pm
Dangit, this one suckered me in also.
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:01 pm
Killerbee, it looks like someone had WAY TOO MUCH time on thier hands. Not only is the moose photoshopped into the pic, the harness and such are also photoshopped onto the moose! (At least that's the way it looks to me when I copied and blew it up)
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:21 pm
wow that's a tough one!
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:39 am
The logging site is photoshopped as well.... if you look at the log piles they are reversed images of each other.
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 3:23 pm
You guys just runined my dream... Thanks alot!
It was good photoshop work, Some people need to get a job.
It was good photoshop work, Some people need to get a job.
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 5:29 pm
great spoe meathunter! so how do you guys spot these , just study the pic and look for flaws??? or are you using a computer program? i never even think about it being a photoshop job, guess i'm going to have to start.
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 5:41 pm
Killerbee, I don't know about meathunter but I just load them up in photoshop and blow them up. I then start lookin' for any pixal manipulations, irregularities, etc.
This one was easy to spot once meathunter brought it up. I just never thought to look at it that closely.
This one was easy to spot once meathunter brought it up. I just never thought to look at it that closely.
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:35 pm
i dont see how its fake it looks real to me.
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:07 pm
just look at what they are posting, the lines of the legs,the log deck, the harness lines, you can tell after they point them out. the log decks are the axact same just backwards.
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:06 pm
Coloradobuck
See if this will help.
See if this will help.