BCS
JBird
12/2/07 8:06pm
Personally I don't like the BCS. I think they should have the conferance champs play play-off games to determine the National Champ, this voting for the National Champ is terrible.
2,005
There is no other time during the season when a topped ranked team (In this case both #1 and #2) lose and teams ranked 3rd and 7th leapfrog into the top two slots!
You know why...cause this way the BCS idiots can say "We've had this right all along!"
How can Ohio St jump that high without playing ANYONE...and leapfrog Georgia to boot?! Not to mention, VT beat a TOUGH BC team just this weekend and were ranked higher than LSU was!
The other travisty....that Kansas gets a BCS bowl yet Mizzou does not. How does that happen? Mizzou was ranked #1 just yesterday, beat Kansas...and thier only two losses where to Oklahoma.
(Mizzou's schedule strength was 29th in the nation while Kansas' was 109th out of 119 division one schools...THAT is telling enough!)
The ONLY way to solve this would be a play-off system but it will NEVER happen. WAY TOO MUCH money involved in these stinking bowls for anyone to allow a true play-off system to be put in place.
What a crock! I'm done ranting now....idiots!
VT was left out of the title game despite being ranked No. 1 by the BCS computers?!?! What the heck?!?!?!
Oklahoma was left out of the title game despite beating the No. 1 team in the nation to win the Big 12 title?!?!
Georgia was ranked fourth in last week's BCS rankings, so how can they fall to fifth and out of the title game when they didn't even play?
Mizzou was left out of the BCS despite beating Kansas head-to-head for the Big 12 North title. Kansas, meanwhile, is going to the Orange Bowl.
(Again, not to rehash it but Mizzou's strength of schedule was 29th...the Jayhawks' was 109th)
Man I HATE the BCS!
if oregons QB wouldn't have gotten hurt there would be no questions who was number 1 :)) [ but if frogs had wings they wouldn't hit there butts everytime they hopped either] (???) (???)