Coyotes and Deer Focus of New Study

by Mark Hadley

(Utah) - There’s no question that coyotes kill mule deer, especially fawns.

But just how many fawns do coyotes kill? And how does the killing affect the number of mule deer in Utah?

What about efforts to control coyotes? How effective are those efforts? And how do those efforts help deer in the state?

Biologists with the Division of Wildlife Resources want to know. In cooperation with Brigham Young University and Utah State University, they’re launching a study to find out.

The study begins in June on Monroe Mountain in south-central Utah. If you’d like to help with the study, you can—biologists and university researchers need volunteers.

To learn more about the project and to sign up to help, plan on attending a meeting on May 17 in the auditorium at the Sixth District Courthouse in Richfield.

The May 17 meeting starts at 7 p.m. The courthouse is at 845 E. 300 N.

For more information, call the DWR’s office in Cedar City at (435) 865-6100.

Studying fawns and coyotes

Here’s how the study this summer will work:

• Doe mule deer will be captured and fitted with radio collars and a vaginal-implant transmitter (VIT) that will be inserted in such a way that it will exit the doe when she gives birth to a fawn.

When the VIT is expelled, it will begin transmitting, alerting biologists that a fawn has been born and giving them the exact location where the fawn is.

Immediately, biologists and a volunteer search crew will travel to the area to find the fawn and fit it with an expandable radio collar.

Once the fawns are fitted with the expandable collars, biologists will monitor them for about six months to see how many fawns survive the first critical months of their lives.

Deer fawns aren’t the only animals that will have radio collars placed on their necks—coyotes will too.

• After collaring the coyotes, biologists and researchers will monitor them to assess the coyotes’ location in relation to deer fawns in the area.

• As part of the study, personnel with USDA-Wildlife Services will also conduct high-intensity coyote control on half of the Monroe management unit. On the other half, no coyote control will happen. Comparing how fawns did on areas where coyotes were controlled versus how they did on areas with no control will help biologists and researchers learn more about the effect coyote control has on the number of fawns that survive.

• Placing collars on coyotes will also allow researchers to estimate the size of the coyote population, how the coyotes use the habitat, the coyotes’ activity patterns and the effect coyote control work has on the coyote population.

Millions spent to help Utah’s mule deer

The study on Monroe Mountain is just one of several things the DWR and its partners are doing to help mule deer in Utah. In just the past six years, tens of millions of dollars have been spent to help the state’s deer herds:

Restoring deer habitat: At a cost of more than $76 million, the DWR and its partners have improved mule deer habitat on nearly 780,000 acres over the past six years alone. Another 500,000 acres of habitat improvement is in the planning stages. These habitat improvements often take several years before they become established and are fully effective. But, in the future, this effort will result in healthier mule deer populations in Utah.

Reducing highway mortality: Deer-auto collisions kill thousands of deer in Utah annually. No one knows exactly how many are killed, but the DWR is working closely with the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) to reduce the number. Since 2005, UDOT has spent more than $47 million to build fences and highway-crossing structures to help both deer and elk cross roads safely. The DWR is also funding two Utah State University projects to learn more about the effect highway mortality is having on Utah’s deer herds.

Stopping deer poachers: The DWR has put additional resources into the capture and prosecution of deer poachers. As a result, several criminals who have killed multiple deer have been arrested. One example of the effect the DWR’s efforts are having is the reduced number of big game animals that were killed illegally during the past two winters, a time when deer are especially vulnerable to poaching.

During the winter of 2010 – 2011, DWR officers know of 72 big game animals that were illegally killed. During the winter of 2011 – 2012, that number dropped to 57.

Limiting the spread of disease: More than $1 million has been spent to research and monitor chronic wasting and other diseases that affect mule deer in Utah.

Monitoring deer on winter range: Winter is the most critical time in a mule deer’s life. Survival is difficult even under the best of circumstances. Each winter, biologists monitor the activity of deer in wintering areas, paying close attention to range conditions, snow depth, the temperature of the air and the body condition of the deer.

Contact:

Lynn Chamberlain, DWR Southern Region Conservation Outreach Manager (435) 680-0059 or (435) 865-6100

Mark Hadley, DWR Relations with the Public Specialist (801) 538-4737

Read more: KCSG Television - Coyotes and Deer Focus of New Study
4,902
MuleyMadness
Thoughts? I personally love this study. Hope they learn some valuable info., sure they will.

What do the locals think, seems like the Monroe is getting all the studies lately...I kinda wish they would study an area with a greater population of Deer myself. But hey a study like this anywhere is GOOD.
10
ridgetop
I think it's a good thing. It kind of reminds me of what people might have been thinking about smoking in the 1950s. Many people believed smoking was bad for you but there was not enough studies or data to show otherwise. Now many decades later, we have enough data to show it really is bad for you. I hope it doesn't take several decades for enough "data" to show coyotes are really bad for mule deer fawns.
10
dahlmer
I think this will provide some really interesting information. I wonder how many fawns are lost to predation within the first few days of brith.
10
a_bow_nut
It's good to see a real study based on fact finding and results from those findings.

It will be quite the undertaking and I hope that they learn a ton of info from it.

Now that is something that is worth a extra $5 dollars charge to my hunting license, not just a so called bounty.
10
BOHNTR
I agree, i think this is a great study and quite frankly, long overdue. I can't wait until the findings are published.
10
derekp1999
I think this is a great study and could provide a lot of good data... HOWEVER, I see a flaw.
The DWR comes out every year with a statement telling the general public to keep their distance if they find a fawn in the wild for several reasons (to keep your sent off it, to not clue in predators to its whereabouts, etc.).
I can't help but think that when the VIT drops and the researchers spring into action to collar the fawn that they might actually be initiating part of the problem? Could the collaring of some of these fawns be the reason that they don't survive, where they otherwise may have had they not been collared in the first place? Unless these researchers are absolutely scentless when handling the fawns (which I doubt they will be)... they could be ultimately altering the results of the study without even realizing it.
Fawns stay with their mothers... perhaps a better protocol would be to collar the doe when the VIT is placed. When the VIT hits the ground and starts transmitting activate the corresponding collar on mom & don't even mess with the fawn. Then you watch mom to find the fawn. It's not as direct, but it eliminates handling the fawn which is a huge variable.
Just some thoughts from a guy that designs & performs microbiological experiments for a living.
10
Springville Shooter
You have some great thoughts Derek, but one issue that comes to my mind is that for this study to be valid, corpses of dead fawns must be retrieved and positive cause of mortality must be determined. I actually think that human scent might protect fawns just as much as it gives them away. I started leaving a sweaty shirt on carcasses that had to be left overnight and I have never had one touched by mammal predators. Birds like magpies will still feed on the carcass, but coyotes etc seem to stay away. While I can see several downsides to handling the fawns, I believe that it is a control that must be in place to maintain effective scientific method. We need to develope a collor that attaches under the tail of the doe and is installed as the fawn is born. I took part in several wildlife studies while in college and would highly recommend the experience.--------SS
10
Muleys 24/7
Intresting, I hope everything go's as planned and they get all the info.
10
9er
I will be looking forward to the results of this study!!

From the sounds of it, the collars will only be on for 6 months, is that correct?
10