Elk Fishing
AntlersOutWest
2/22/07 2:49pm
These are taken at Fort Peck Lake, these guys were fishing with big
down riggers for the big lake salmon,and they snagged this bull elk,
it took 2+ hours to reel him in. I guess I'll have to try trolling
for the next elk I hunt for! ____________________________________________________________
IMG]http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s31/antlersoutwest/pic03817.jpg [/IMG]


http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s31/antlersoutwest/pic26196.jpg " alt="" />


http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s31/antlersoutwest/pic30337.jpg " alt="" />
down riggers for the big lake salmon,and they snagged this bull elk,
it took 2+ hours to reel him in. I guess I'll have to try trolling
for the next elk I hunt for! ____________________________________________________________
IMG]


9,029
that is crazy for sure, and a very BIG bull!
What a find huh?
1) NONYA's post about it being taken at Fort Peck MT and the other "thought" that it occured in the Hanford Reach area of WA are the two most popular scenarios. Both areas look very similar, have a lot of BIG bulls around, both have early archery hunts, and both are great and very popular fishing destinations. I have personally been to both areas and I cannot tell from the photos (not much land showing) which one it is but I would put money on it that it's one of the two.
2) I have found no such info that it was poached. I get poaching info from both states and thus far it has not appeared. A bull this big would have been reported on.
3) The idea that it was caught with downriggers just doesn't ring true.
Lookin' at the photos, it does not appear to me that thier downrigger is in use and judging from the gear they do have on board I believe they were fishin' by other means.
Not to mention, the bull looks to be in great shape and a fairly fresh kill. It sure doesn't look like anything that would be pulled from the bottom. additionally, they would have to have some serious rigs set up to drag that big boy off the bottom in the first place (i.e. sturgeon rigs).
With White sturgeon/Pallid sturgeon being protected in Montana (Since 1979 I believe) I doubt they had them set up that way. Also, and NONYA may be able to shed more light on this, really the only other fishing inwhich downriggers are used with regularity at Fort Peck is for Chinook near the face of the dam and judging by the fishermen's clothes, it's not the right time of year.
On that note, just about every fishing boat I've seen on the Columbia (The Columbia runs through the Hanford Reach) has downriggers set up. The Columbia is a GREAT sturgeon river and they are not protected like they are in Montana.
I cannot say with confidence that any of the theories are "wrong", nor can I say with confidence that they are "right" at this time. I'll keep lookin' and sooner or later I'll find something more concrete. If anyone has anything such as a Fish and Game report, newspaper article, or testimony I would love to see it. I rather enjoy this "CSI" type work but additional info would always help.
In the 2nd pic, see the trees, To big to be that close to the water. After a few years of low water the mud flats extend 100's of yards to the nearest brush. And the only brushy spots I know of is above the lake on the river and the river is much narrower.
Side note, over the years a lot of wildlife antelope herds, mule deer, and Elk have perished on the wide Missouri, going through thin ice.