Its here
MULEY7MM
12/16/08 7:08am
:thumb
http://wildlife.utah.gov/guidebooks/2009_biggame/2009_biggame.pdf
7,861
Again, thank you for posting that.
Justin
Question about the new dedicated hunter requirement of 40 service hours. I performed 8 of the 24 required last year to get my first tag. I wonder if i'll be doing 32 hours instead of 16 this year to get my second tag. I'm not lazy, I know the extra hours go to a good cause, I just want to minimize the weekends that I spend away from family.
My brother did all 24 of his hours last year. I wonder if he'll be doing 16 more to get a tag this year.
40 hours is a lot compared to what it was. I wonder if this will lessen the amount of people that try to get into the program? What are others opinions? I know for me no matter how hard the requirements get I would still do the program. I love the chance to get in the hills and go for large class mule deer. A kill isnt all that important to me. I just finshed my 9th year in the program and have only killed 3 bucks in those 9 years. Just wondering what others think, and if some just join the program to guaurentee them a tag... I know alot of people that do that.. Go out and kill 2 bucks the first 2 years regardless of size and sit out the 3rd.
I agree that the 40 hours might lessen the number of people signing up. I've been on dedicated service projects where I worked 5 hours and was credited 8. I've also been on ones where I worked eight hours provided gas, generator, materials, and equipment with the promise of extra hours but only been credited the 8 hours. All works out in the end, but 40 is a lot of time to donate, especially when drive time and other costs are generally not credited towards your hours.
I was in the program for three years the first time it opened. On the first year of that hunt I missed an absolute monster on the muzzleloader. I think that either made me more of a dedicated hunter or ruined me. During those three years I passed on several bucks that were way better than anything I've shot before. I went the first three years with no filled tag.
I am in my first year of the second three year term. The buck I took this year made up for the no tag fulfilment of the first three year program. I had lowered my expectations and was planning on not going home without at least a meat buck during this second round of the dedicated program. Now that I've got a good one, I have a couple of year to try for another good one.
A big motivating factor in re-uping for the program is the fact that I can get a southern tag to hunt the same canyon my family has hunted for 21 years. The three years between my two dedicated hunter programs reulted in only one general season tag and no LEs. That is a big part of the lure to join the dedicated program.
It's long, but you did ask for opinions. :))
To answer the question about LE tag from NotEnufTags. If a DH draws out a limited entry tag, they forego that year in the program. For example: if you are in your 2nd year of the program and you’ve drawn a great LE tag and decided to use it. If you’ve already received your DH tag, the first thing you must do is surrender it then go hunting on your LE tag, DURING the specified dates. You pass up the opportunity to hunt all 3 hunts in your 2nd year and move on to your 3rd year. As simple as that.
It was kind of ridiculous to go to the Southern RAC meeting this last year. The public comments made by fellow hunters were totally useless!! On some of the issues there was not one public comment that agreed with what the board voted.. Kind of made me lose faith in our officials. If the DWR recommended it, they went with it.. And the DWR stated there was no "biological evidence" THAT SUPORTED WHAT THEY RECOMMENDED.. It was all about money!!! I have no problem paying more money for tags etc.. If it will help our wildlife populations and quality.. And they talked about a survey they sent out by email to people asking for info. on the matters they voted on. I never got one, and noone I know did either.. Did any of you fellow hunters receive this survey? It was just a real dissapointing night in my opinion. Good thing the other RACs around the state at least had their heads pulled out of their butts a bit.. haha
I am just wondering others opinions down south where they have had the 5 day hunt in effect. I know since they started it, I have seen the quality of deer get alot better. Have any others seen this, or seen differently. I was realy disapointed to see it changed back. I thought it realy helped the herd, but I hope they dont all get slaughterd this year out on "burned" utah hill!!
I am just wondering others opinions down south where they have had the 5 day hunt in effect. I know since they started it, I have seen the quality of deer get alot better. Have any others seen this, or seen differently. I was realy disapointed to see it changed back. I thought it realy helped the herd
I'm for the shorter rifle hunt. Muzzle loader is my preferred hunt, but the rifle is a nice dedicated hunter opportunity to continue looking for a big one.
We had a new group come into the canyon we normally hunt. We typically have 5 tags and have enjoyed sharing the canyon with one to five other hunters that come and go from year to year. This year a kid with a dedicated hunter tag saw me field dressing my big buck on the second day of the muzzle loader. He had seen my brother field dress his the day before and decided that the cnayon was a great hunting spot. It is, but I wish he didn't know it, because come the rifle hunt he came back with twenty of his "best" friends and their tags. I quote "best" because he didn't even know the names of some of the people in his camp.
They shot the crap out of the bucks in the canyon. Spikes, twos and threes, and a couple of nice 25" four points. Including mine and my brothers bucks, 11 bucks were taken out of "my" hunting canyon. It's a small area maybe 1.5 square miles. I really worry about its future. As for the 5 day hunt it definitely would be better for the area I hunt.
A longer hunt will only compound the death toll.