Killing of rare grizzly bear probed

Interesting article. I wonder what will happen to the hunter? After all, even if Grizzly have not been seen in the area for many years, you MUST know exactly what you are shooting under all circumstances. Ignorance is no excuse (at least as far as the game department is concerned).
Also noted, the guide was not with the hunter when the bear was killed. I wonder what he thought when he realized that his client had killed a Grizzly vice a Black bear? I applaud him for taking the bear out of the woods and reporting it though. He very well could have just left it, asked his client to keep quite about it, and hope that noone finds out (Hence a couple previous threads about crooked outfitters/guides).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BOISE, Idaho - Federal and state wildlife officials said Friday they are investigating the killing of a grizzly bear in north-central Idaho, where the last confirmed sighting of the species was in 1946.

The bear, a member of a threatened species, was killed Monday by a hunter near Kelly Creek about three miles from the Montana border, said Steve Nadeau, statewide large carnivore manager for the Idaho fish and game department.

Nadeau said the bear was not confirmed as a grizzly until Friday, after the hunter and guide had packed it out of the remote, roadless area and contacted authorities.

Officials did not release the identities of the hunter or the guide, who was not present when the bear was killed.

Nadeau said the hunter, who is from Tennessee, was on a guided trip, hunting black bear with bait. Black bear hunting season opened Aug. 30.

Nadeau said the male grizzly weighed 400 to 500 pounds and was 6 to 8 years old. The hunter and guide skinned the carcass and brought it out on horseback so it could be confirmed as a grizzly by authorities, Nadeau said.

It is now in the possession of state fish and game department.

In April, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lifted Endangered Species Act protections for grizzlies in and around Yellowstone National Park.

But the bear killed Monday was not part of that population, Nadeau said, and therefore retained federal threatened-species protection. He said that is why the investigation also involves federal authorities.

Asked whether the hunter would likely face penalties, Nadeau said the matter was under investigation.

Chris Servheen, Fish and Wildlife grizzly bear recovery coordinator, said the death was under investigation.

In a federal court lawsuit, several environmental groups have challenged the federal decision to lift the 32-year-old "threatened" status for the 500 to 600 Yellowstone-area bears, which live in parts of Wyoming, Idaho and Montana.

The groups say the grizzly gene pool is still too small to assure future viability of the species that once roamed the area by the thousands.

The bear killed this week was in the Selway-Bitterroot ecosystem that includes part of north-central Idaho and western Montana, and where wildlife officials have been expecting grizzly bears to repopulate on their own.

"We've put an awful lot of effort in over the years to verify grizzly bears are in the Selway ecosystem," Nadeau said. "That's one area where we expected grizzly bears to show up — Kelly Creek."

Nadeau said the bear possibly came from the Cabinet-Yaak ecosystem in western Montana or the Northern Continental Divide ecosystem that includes Glacier National Park. DNA tests are planned to try and determine the bear's origin.

Prior to Friday, Nadeau said Fish and Game had been telling black bear hunters that there were no grizzly bears in the area. He said hunters are now being warned that grizzlies are in the area, and that they are not legal to hunt.

"Where there's one there are likely others," said Nadeau. "Grizzly bears, like other animals, try to find each other."
2,487
bigbuck92
i heard a story very similair to this a while back ago except it was in a part of wyoming but with the wyoming incident the Griz was very sickly and was very skinny and had a darker colored coat. The F&G officer even had a hard time identifying it.
0
AGCHAWK
Oh yea, I'm sure there are instances when it would be difficult to tell the difference. Not to mention, if Griz had not been seen in the region since '46 then I doubt the hunter OR guide where even worried about confusing the two.

Maybe I should have worded my statement a bit different. I'm sure it was unintentional and I'm also sure that the hunter and guide don't exactly feel great about what happened. WHAT I MEANT was...The game department does not take ignorance as an excuse.
0
Default Avatar
Although the hunter should have been able to tell the difference between a griz and a black bear, regardless of color phase I have to give them kudos for doing the right thing.

They could have left the bear or hid it, but instead they did the right thing, recovered it and turned it in.

They were honorable men and did the right thing regardless of the conciquences.
0