MT Fish and Game found guilty...
NONYA
3/25/10 9:30am
Thier bs sting where the warden poached a monster ram has bit them in the arse....now when do they convict themselves for fraud and theft of a game animal?
Taxidermist not guilty in ram poaching caseLogin | Register | Subscribe
Font Size: Default font size Larger font size BOULDER — A jury here acquitted a Whitehall taxidermist Wednesday of buying an illegally killed bighorn ram from an undercover state game warden following a five-day trial.
Jurors in about two hours found that John Lewton was innocent of buying the ram, which was shot by a state game warden during a September 2008 sting investigation of Lewton for illegal outfitting. Lewton shook the hand of Jack Morris, a Whitehall lawyer representing him, as Judge Loren Tucker read the jury’s decision in Boulder district court.
“The verdict speaks for itself,” Morris said.
Morris is under a gag order requested by the state in the case, and because charges are pending against Lewton in two other counties said he could not comment further.
The case arose from the undercover operation that the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks undertook. The department had received several complaints that Lewton, a filmmaker, had for years been illegally outfitting clients on bighorn hunts in the Missouri River Breaks country east of Great Falls.
During the operation Justin Gibson, a game warden working undercover, shot a large bighorn ram after purposely missing it three times. Lewton weeks later bought the ram from Gibson for $5,000 at Lewton’s Whitehall shop Cape Horn Taxidermy.
The state alleged that purchase was illegal because Lewton knew it was killed illegally. It presented evidence that Lewton and his assistants Blake Trangmoe and James Reed used two-way radios to lead Gibson and another undercover agent to the ram, illegally trespassed across private land and illegally went off road with all-terrain vehicles.
But Morris in his closing arguments pressed the defense he used all week — that the state was in the wrong for killing the ram. He worked to cast doubt in jurors about whether any of those crimes applied to Lewton because it was Gibson who had the tag. State officials issued the tag to Gibson under an alias as part of the operation.
Morris told jurors if they convicted Lewton, they would set a precedent by which they could be charged if accompanying a family member who broke a game law. And he said FWP was trying to cover up its botched investigation after Gibson killed a trophy-quality ram.
“When things don’t look good, you point the finger at guys like John Lewton,” Morris said. “You have to find in order to convict John Lewton that he was the hunter, and he wasn’t.”
Morris said Gibson planted one of the radios that was recovered a week later in the effort to prove the devices were used. Morris said Lewton is disliked by licensed outfitters because he takes people out hunting for free to videotape their hunts, which costs them money.
But Assistant Attorney General Kathleen Jenks urged jurors to look at the facts in the case about all the illegal activity that she said Lewton took while leading the hunt. She said Lewton, Trangmoe and Reed were clearly hunting that weekend when they helped chase the ram.
“The term ‘hunt’ includes pursuing the sheep, it includes chasing the sheep,” she said. “Mr. Lewton was right there telling Mr. Gibson what to do, where to hunt, which ram to shoot, when to shoot.”
Jenks said that’s why Lewton was seen on tape coaching Gibson not to tell anyone about the radio use or the crossing of private land. She said that demonstrated that he purposely and knowingly broke the law.
“He’s telling Mr. Gibson what to say when he checks that ram because he knows there’s a problem with this hunt,” Jenks said.
Jenks did not comment after the verdict, saying the state still has two cases pending against Lewton in Blaine and Chouteau counties, including charges of illegally outfitting, trespassing and illegal possession of a game animal.
Bob Page, jury foreman, said the 11-man, one-woman jury listened to Tucker’s instructions carefully and applied them during two hours of deliberations. He did not go into details about what evidence led them to the unanimous not guilty verdict.
“We considered everything presented and it was a lively discussion,” he said. “Reasonable doubt was a key element in our determination.”
Jim Kropp, FWP chief of law enforcement, said before the verdict was announced that undercover investigations are part of the state doing its job to shut down illegal activities involving wildlife. He said officials knew there was a chance a game warden would have to shoot a ram in the case, as sometimes happens in wildlife investigations of repeat offenders.
“It’s not about courtroom theatrics, it’s not about accusing our officers of lying or planting evidence,” he said. “This investigation focuses on the protection of our treasured resources for the future.”
Reporter Nick Gevock:nick.gevock@mtstandard.com
Taxidermist not guilty in ram poaching caseLogin | Register | Subscribe
Font Size: Default font size Larger font size BOULDER — A jury here acquitted a Whitehall taxidermist Wednesday of buying an illegally killed bighorn ram from an undercover state game warden following a five-day trial.
Jurors in about two hours found that John Lewton was innocent of buying the ram, which was shot by a state game warden during a September 2008 sting investigation of Lewton for illegal outfitting. Lewton shook the hand of Jack Morris, a Whitehall lawyer representing him, as Judge Loren Tucker read the jury’s decision in Boulder district court.
“The verdict speaks for itself,” Morris said.
Morris is under a gag order requested by the state in the case, and because charges are pending against Lewton in two other counties said he could not comment further.
The case arose from the undercover operation that the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks undertook. The department had received several complaints that Lewton, a filmmaker, had for years been illegally outfitting clients on bighorn hunts in the Missouri River Breaks country east of Great Falls.
During the operation Justin Gibson, a game warden working undercover, shot a large bighorn ram after purposely missing it three times. Lewton weeks later bought the ram from Gibson for $5,000 at Lewton’s Whitehall shop Cape Horn Taxidermy.
The state alleged that purchase was illegal because Lewton knew it was killed illegally. It presented evidence that Lewton and his assistants Blake Trangmoe and James Reed used two-way radios to lead Gibson and another undercover agent to the ram, illegally trespassed across private land and illegally went off road with all-terrain vehicles.
But Morris in his closing arguments pressed the defense he used all week — that the state was in the wrong for killing the ram. He worked to cast doubt in jurors about whether any of those crimes applied to Lewton because it was Gibson who had the tag. State officials issued the tag to Gibson under an alias as part of the operation.
Morris told jurors if they convicted Lewton, they would set a precedent by which they could be charged if accompanying a family member who broke a game law. And he said FWP was trying to cover up its botched investigation after Gibson killed a trophy-quality ram.
“When things don’t look good, you point the finger at guys like John Lewton,” Morris said. “You have to find in order to convict John Lewton that he was the hunter, and he wasn’t.”
Morris said Gibson planted one of the radios that was recovered a week later in the effort to prove the devices were used. Morris said Lewton is disliked by licensed outfitters because he takes people out hunting for free to videotape their hunts, which costs them money.
But Assistant Attorney General Kathleen Jenks urged jurors to look at the facts in the case about all the illegal activity that she said Lewton took while leading the hunt. She said Lewton, Trangmoe and Reed were clearly hunting that weekend when they helped chase the ram.
“The term ‘hunt’ includes pursuing the sheep, it includes chasing the sheep,” she said. “Mr. Lewton was right there telling Mr. Gibson what to do, where to hunt, which ram to shoot, when to shoot.”
Jenks said that’s why Lewton was seen on tape coaching Gibson not to tell anyone about the radio use or the crossing of private land. She said that demonstrated that he purposely and knowingly broke the law.
“He’s telling Mr. Gibson what to say when he checks that ram because he knows there’s a problem with this hunt,” Jenks said.
Jenks did not comment after the verdict, saying the state still has two cases pending against Lewton in Blaine and Chouteau counties, including charges of illegally outfitting, trespassing and illegal possession of a game animal.
Bob Page, jury foreman, said the 11-man, one-woman jury listened to Tucker’s instructions carefully and applied them during two hours of deliberations. He did not go into details about what evidence led them to the unanimous not guilty verdict.
“We considered everything presented and it was a lively discussion,” he said. “Reasonable doubt was a key element in our determination.”
Jim Kropp, FWP chief of law enforcement, said before the verdict was announced that undercover investigations are part of the state doing its job to shut down illegal activities involving wildlife. He said officials knew there was a chance a game warden would have to shoot a ram in the case, as sometimes happens in wildlife investigations of repeat offenders.
“It’s not about courtroom theatrics, it’s not about accusing our officers of lying or planting evidence,” he said. “This investigation focuses on the protection of our treasured resources for the future.”
Reporter Nick Gevock:
3,464

NotEnufTags
3/25/10 10:35pm
Thanks for the follow up post Nonya. I had wondered what if anything would come about in that case.
1

NONYA
3/26/10 8:58am
So far all the courts have proved is how low down dirty tactics dont do anything but make the F&G look bad,they couldnt catch this guy doing anything wrong(only investigated him because the outfitters in the breaks were crying about him) so they trie to tempt him into breaking several laws,the only one he was accused of was outfitting without a liscence,they couldnt even scrape together enough bs evidence to convict him with that one(he accepted no money to guide),so they tried to frame him for buying the head and several other pidly charges.
1

182BC...4Now!
3/26/10 10:16pm
I too had wondered what happened with this case....F&G appears to be wedging their own boot deeper and deeper. Thanks for the update.
1

a_bow_nut
3/27/10 5:22pm
Yeah I love how the law can do what they want wether it's right or not under the ruse of protecting game. We had a guy here that caught a new state record walleye many years ago. The fish and game told him that they wanted to mount it for him and put it on display for awhile. Once they had control of the fish they charged him with snagging the fish and were going to take him to court. After a month they still couldn't find any snag marks so they had a taxidermist mount it up and they dropped the charges. The funny part was that when he was charged the story made the paper but after they returned his fish there wasn't anything in the paper about how they were wrong.
1

stillhunterman
3/27/10 6:10pm
Things like this probably happen more times than we ever hear about.... :>/
1