Question bout stalking a goat.
Coloradobuck
8/31/07 4:44pm
is it hard to stalk a goat with a rifle like all the huntn shows say it is?
7,096
(@@) :dumb DUMB PEOPLE OUT THERE
who should not be allowed to own a firearm
Here is a prime example this happened in 2003 and is from the Violatios report of the Colorado DOW WEBSITE
I added some emotions because I am bored though this funny that some is that dumb it is not funny that it happend
Suspect Shoots Wrong Species: Tracks Not Enough to Identify Target
Wildlife Officers Michael Blanck and Kirk Oldham were on patrol during
the 2003 third regular rifle season early in November. As they entered a
hunting area regularly occupied by a variety of hunters called
Church Park, in Middle Park, they noticed two individuals carrying rifles
creeping through a meadow. The wildlife officers stopped on the road and
watched to see what the two men were stalking.
The wildlife officers watched one of the men drop to a knee, look through
his scope, and shoot. The other man was watching through his rifle scope
as well. The shooter then stood up and began to walk towards
the edge of the meadow. dwr:: Blanck and Oldham could not see what the men
had been shooting at.
The shooter stood at the edge of the meadow, turned around, and held
his rifle above his head. He was shaking it up and down as if to indicate
that he had killed what he was shooting at. :tz
The second man 34, walked up to the shooter.
They both stared at the animal they had killed. (???)
Then one of them finally looked in the direction of the wildlife officers.
The shooter's partner slowly began to walk towards them.
When Oldham contacted him, he stated that he :-k 'thought' they
had killed a moose. (???)
Since there was no moose season on, dwr:: Blanck
and Oldham knew that there was a problem. :nono:
The wildlife officers dwr:: approached the hunter who was standing
approximately 5 yards away from a large bull moose. The shooter :333
asked them if the animal was a moose. :-k He wasn't entirely sure
(???) that the animal lying in front of them with large palmate antlers, a
dark brown/black coat, a distinctive bulbous nosepad, and a
distinctive "bell" around the throat was a moose. :dumb
Oldham advised the soon-to-be defendant that
it was in fact a moose. :dumb (@@)
Both hunters had bull elk licenses. They stated that
they had followed a set of large two-toed tracks that
must have been those of an elk. The shooter said that he had seen
movement in the trees at the edge of the meadow. The hunter said that
he had seen an animal with antlers and a brow tine. As he continued to
use the scope of his rifle to identify the (@) animal, he had lost sight of it
As soon as he saw the antlers again, he :333 shot once and the animal
went down. He had hit it once at the base of the antler with a .300 caliber
Winchester Magnum.:222
dwr:: Oldham asked the hunters to field dress the moose.
Neither of them had ever field dressed an animal before, (???)
so dwr:: Blanck helped them out.
dwr:: Oldham brought the pickup next to the moose so that it could be
loaded. The wildlife officers had a ‘spike’ bull elk head seized from a
previous violation :nono: in the pickup bed. The :333 shooter looked in
the pickup, saw the elk head, and then asked where Oldham had picked
up the ‘antelope’? :dumb (@@)
dwr:: Blanck calmly explained that it was an elk. (X) ](*,) ](*,) (???)
The shooter was charged with hunting without a valid/proper license,
unlawful possession, and the additional Samson (trophy poaching)
surcharge. All totaled, the violations equaled $15,795 and 30 points
against their hunting and fishing privileges. :tz [-o< -#-
Working with the District Attorney, the shooter pled guilty to hunting
without a valid/proper license and a deferred judgment on the surcharge.
He paid $4,425 in fines and agreed to pay an additional $5,000 to the
local sheriff's department per the stipulation of the deferred judgment.
Both hunters were from the Denver area.