Repost - 150gr or 180gr for Muley/Elk in 300 Win Mag
byuauhunter
9/3/11 10:58am
I figured I'd post this in the Elk thread to get your opinion as well...
As most know by now I'm relatively new. I've been shooting 150 gr in my 300 WM for my first 3 years of Mule Deer. I'd like to start hunting elk at some point but was concerned that the lighter/faster bullet might not have enough penetration for elk. Ideally, with my 300 Win Mag I'd like to use one bullet for both my Deer/Elk so I don't have to zero between seasons.
My initial motivation behind the 150gr when I started was I assumed it would be a lighter recoil. I figured why not go with the lightest round that will still be effective.
Now, the more I read I hear things like "180 gr in a 300 WM is better for both muley/elk because the velocity's are a bit slower and you'll get better expansion/penetration and short ranges of 300yds or less whereas a 150gr might shoot flatter but at potentially short distances you'll ruin lots of meat since the velocity is so high".
I got my first (and only) muley in 2009 at about 30 yards when he burst over a small hill behind me trotting behind a doe. I did notice while butchering him that the bullet exploded into a million pieces. I've heard that's because the the velocity was still super high at 30yds?
I'm just not starting to learn about ballistics so theres a lot I'm either missing or simply understand incorrectly.
Just to preface. At this point I don't feel comfortable going beyond about 250-300 accurately.
Can I stick with the 150gr for both or should I switch to a 180?
Thanks
As most know by now I'm relatively new. I've been shooting 150 gr in my 300 WM for my first 3 years of Mule Deer. I'd like to start hunting elk at some point but was concerned that the lighter/faster bullet might not have enough penetration for elk. Ideally, with my 300 Win Mag I'd like to use one bullet for both my Deer/Elk so I don't have to zero between seasons.
My initial motivation behind the 150gr when I started was I assumed it would be a lighter recoil. I figured why not go with the lightest round that will still be effective.
Now, the more I read I hear things like "180 gr in a 300 WM is better for both muley/elk because the velocity's are a bit slower and you'll get better expansion/penetration and short ranges of 300yds or less whereas a 150gr might shoot flatter but at potentially short distances you'll ruin lots of meat since the velocity is so high".
I got my first (and only) muley in 2009 at about 30 yards when he burst over a small hill behind me trotting behind a doe. I did notice while butchering him that the bullet exploded into a million pieces. I've heard that's because the the velocity was still super high at 30yds?
I'm just not starting to learn about ballistics so theres a lot I'm either missing or simply understand incorrectly.
Just to preface. At this point I don't feel comfortable going beyond about 250-300 accurately.
Can I stick with the 150gr for both or should I switch to a 180?
Thanks
13,519
Kevin
But you still have to love the initial 3200 FPS chrony reading on the 150s
lol
Barnes TSX or TTSX - both are accurate and devastating.
Nosler Partition - fantastic bullet not quite as consistent as the Barnes but still a winner
Hornady SST - Accurate and majorly devastating. I stopped using these due to the damage to the animal. If you read customer comments on the Cabela's website people mark down the SST down because the SST causes alot of damage to the animal, however they are very accurate.