rmef,mdf,sfw,etc...
The Ox
2/21/10 5:17pm
So i am curious ,(this is just a thought)maybe this all seems dumb and a waste of time but was just juggling things in my head.i can never decide what hunting organization to actually support...so my question is- why does there need to be this many little foundations ,like sfw, rmef, and mdf,turkey foundations and all the others out there. wouldnt it make sportsmens voices a little stronger if all the organizations merged in to one ultimate hunting foundation, instead of having dozens of little ones?
For instance, NRA doesnt just branch out for one type of gun like say hand guns or rifles or assualt rifles only, they support our right to have firearms. if all the hunting organizations could become one and disperse the same fight to the antis for our rights for hunting, and disperse percentages of proceeds to all wildlife such as say 5 percent proceeds to turkey improvents ,10 to mule deer, 10 percent to elk...etc i would think there would ultimatley be more money distrubuted to wildlife with there being one board of directors over an entire hunting foundation than having dozens of organizations happening to pay to every director of every foundation.
i also think there are many people that cant actually decide which group to join like me, out there. which, with just one hunting organization it would make the decision quite a bit easier.
Anyway i think you get the jist of what i am saying...am i crazy or would something of this nature be more beneficial to preserve hunting rights,and improve hunting all together?
For instance, NRA doesnt just branch out for one type of gun like say hand guns or rifles or assualt rifles only, they support our right to have firearms. if all the hunting organizations could become one and disperse the same fight to the antis for our rights for hunting, and disperse percentages of proceeds to all wildlife such as say 5 percent proceeds to turkey improvents ,10 to mule deer, 10 percent to elk...etc i would think there would ultimatley be more money distrubuted to wildlife with there being one board of directors over an entire hunting foundation than having dozens of organizations happening to pay to every director of every foundation.
i also think there are many people that cant actually decide which group to join like me, out there. which, with just one hunting organization it would make the decision quite a bit easier.
Anyway i think you get the jist of what i am saying...am i crazy or would something of this nature be more beneficial to preserve hunting rights,and improve hunting all together?
5,294
Could more be done if there was just ONE organization? Financially yes, otherwise I doubt it. People like to be involved and the bigger a org. gets, the more work, responsibility, leadership, delegation, etc. it needs to run smooth. If the LEADER or leaders are rock solid and good people with good ethics etc. it will work. If not, failure is inevitable...not a matter of if...but when IMO.
NRA is definitely the biggest BY FAR of those mentioned and therefore they have TONS more money than anyone else. They are still very important in a lot of ways, just wish they would spend less money on junk mail. :)
I have supported MDF, SFW, and NRA. I like the smaller guys, because it gives more LOCAL help. You ever seen the NRA do a local guzzle project in your area? NOT ME. :)
I personally support SFW more than anyone right now, I think they have a strong leader and don't agree with all the bashing from a select few. THEY GET STUFF DONE and put there money on the ground. Do I agree with everything they do? No, but that's not the point. YOU CAN'T please everyone...no need to try...any organization will ALWAYS have there nay-sayers no matter how true or good the company is. In fact the better the ORG the more back lash they might take.
Not sure if this makes sense or not either, just rambling.
good points thanks!
I hope your voulenteering or saying notenuftags should be president! But if this ever came to be i promise i would be there supporting it and helping everyway possible... A foundation to support our mule deer and elk in utah and the states around it!
OTH if someone gets the MMF :thumb started I'll whole heartedly support and would even help manage the thing if ya wanted me to.
But this shouldn't be a Utah based thing, but a Western based Mule Deer Foundation or Mule Deer anywhere foundation. We already have the Mule Deer Foundation, do we really need another one?
If so what are/would be the differences to make us unique and separate us or improve upon what we already have?
I was referring to someone else being PRES. (not me). I'd be founder and let you guys do the work, I'm to busy running MuleyMadness Magazine. :) lol