Shooting sticks or bipods?
COOPERD
5/4/06 9:57pm
I have a bipod but I would like to try the shooting sticks. The bipod I have was like $70 and I have only used it a couple of times, last time it pulled out my sling swivel. Lucky I caught my gun as it was falling off of my shoulder. Anyone else ever have that happen?
9,905
Bipods also don't work well when using a scabbard.
I have never had sling I-let problems.
Outside of calling you a Stoney Point sales rep I have to tell you, you have me confused. I'm sure you may have both (Stick and Bi-Pod) but what do you really prefer or do they each really have their own place for a particular hunt?
I have read and respected many of your post but the two different answers from you, have me wondering what is going on.
I'm a Mule Deer hunter and if I were to make my first purchase on a cheater/helper for my shots, what would you or anyone recommend I buy/try "first" the stick or the bi pod. (???)
Many advanced thanks, and hopefully no hard feelings from Hiker!
works really well. I like the fact that it just snaps on when I need it.
Here's a link.
oakbrush
I'm sorry for calling them a Bi-Pod because they're not. They're shooting sticks.....they have two legs and can reach to a height of 60+''. I personally like the thicker, Stoney Point style.
I think I like the idea of a walking stick with the ability to double as a shooting stick, compared to something mounted on my rifle like a bi-pod. As long as i don't forget it laying somewhere preferably after a kill (like I do a putter on a green.) ;-)
Some of the sticks look like nothing more than cheap tent poles. I would think the telescoping type of poles are a bit more sturdy. Can anyone confirm or deny this observation or throw in a few pros and cons about either a telescoping or tent pole type stick.
Thanks