tactical scope question?
muleywannabe
6/29/09 7:51am
Do you guys use tactical scopes on your rifles? or do you just put the ballistics on the stock of the gun? I am thinking of getting a tactical to take the guess work out...but is it worth it? what scope would you recommend?
6,732
Ruger #1 chambered in 7x57 with a Sightron 4X scope, keeping it simple...
Hank
Hey Nonya with all that shooting you must reload. Where are you getting your powder and primers?
I practice all summer long too and it is a great way to spend those long summer days. :thumb
The average hunter is probably going to get all they need from one of the new BDC reticles as most guys aren't going to go to the range and develope dope for their rifles. The mildot reticle was designed for ranging targets, and IMO isn't the best option if you are looking for a reticle you can use for "hold-off" shots.
I think if a hunter wants to take some longer shots you need to have good repeatable turrets that are set for 1/4 MOA or .1 MRAD adjustments, so you can make fine enough adjustments out at range. Some of the tactical scopes out there (IE: Leupold Mark 4 LR/T w/M3 turrets) are designed for rapid elevation adjustments with either .5 or 1 minute clicks, or a BDC type turret. IMO, these are bad choices for hunting if you want to take shots approaching 1000 meters as you can't make fine enough adjustments. I personally dont like the BDC turrets like on the Huskemaw scopes as I dont like being confined to one bullet type/weight.